Here is another quote which shows how Preterist distort scripture by making 70AD their dispensational line seperating the old things from new things. Hill says The AGE of CHRIST ENDED in his Parousia which he says eneded at the fall of Jerusalem in 70AD. I am sort of confused how Hill believes Christ's AGE ends in 70AD and the Age of Grace (which is somehow different from the Age of Christ) begins in 70AD. I guess this means since the "Age of Christ Ended" that we don't go through Jesus after ad70. Apparently, Jesus was ONLY the door from ad 30-70. Michael Hill writes: "Christ's eschaton . . . began at the cross and ended in his parousia (presence/coming) at Jerusalem at the end of the 7-year war with Rome . . . Thus, true to Jesus' words, that old world ended, the dead were judged, the saved were resurrected, and a whole new realm of grace began" (The Cure for Millennial Madness, p. 3).
See the link below on Covenant Confusion.
http://preteristheresy.blogspot.com/2008/01/preterism-covenant-confusion.html
http://preteristheresy.blogspot.com/2008/02/michael-hill-christs-age-ended-in-his.html
