There are a few different doctrines parading themselves as Full Preterism, which actually do not view AD70 as the complete fulfillment of bible prophecy. Various elements of prophetic fulfillment are treated as future, such as the personal resurrection, the personal judgment, and the Parousia of Christ. Ward Fenley clarifies this distinction while focusing on the resurrection as seen by these futurist full preterists. The question becomes... how can it be called truly consistent "Full Preterism" is one believes, for instance, that prophecy is ongoing, though it may be stated as starting at ad70. This, in effect, is a form of idealism... or perhaps just plain futurism. So maybe it is best to distinguish between the two halves of the Full Preterist movement... the consistent Full Preterists, and the Futurist Full Preterists.. because they are clearly not teaching the same doctrine.
So, Full Preterist reader, let me ask you: are you a consistent Full Preterist, or just another Futurist?
Ward Fenley "These same (FULL) preterists pride themselves on seeing the spiritual nature of the coming in AD 70, yet they are essentially futurists. After all, though they believe the second coming happened, they believe that their full redemption remains future. So they are not really preterists simply because they don't believe that all the promises of God are *actually* fulfilled."
groups.yahoo.com/group/SGPList/message/9374
