ThomasS "It was not a man that was destroyed at the Parousia but a demonic spirit that worked through a man. spiritually -- but you do not have any proof for your idea. Facts are: (1) the Roman Empire did not fall in 70 CE. In fact, it grew more powerful after 70 CE; (2) the man that you think the invisible evil spirit was working through was not killed in 70 CE. He became more powerful, viz. emperor, after 70 CE. But I guess you can always make the following argument: IF the interpretation does not fit what is know from visible history, you may say that it was about invisible history......
When they/you say something happened in the invisible world, I cannot argue with that, right? :)"
planetpreterist.com/news-5441.html#38448
http://preteristheresy.blogspot.com/2008/02/invisible-history-who-can-argue-with.html
