Tom G. "Preterism is clearly demonstrated to be the necessary and certain conclusion with the time statements in scripture as the cause. These time statements occur in many different places in scripture and in many different contexts and if the necessary conclusion to all or any one of these time statements is not preteristic than preterism is not a true doctrine. But that conformity of preterism to the time statements is not sufficient proof of the truth of preterism, in addition preterism must be demonstrated that it is the necessary and certain conclusion of the gospel that Paul preached. . .Without that demonstration or the inability to demonstrate that relationship, preterism is presumed to be false and a perversion of the gospel that Paul preached, with the resultant accursedness of anyone who would preach or teach it."
Tom G. "I think that the perversion of the Gospel of Christ is the Gospel of anti-Christ."
planetpreterist.com/news-5428.html#37621
(2 Timothy 4:6-8) For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith: Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.
SO, Paul was not preaching 70AD, but preaching faithful living, living sacrifice, and crossing the finish line which was "at hand". UMM, I guess this means Preterism is presumed to be false and a perversion of the gospel that Paul preached.
http://preteristheresy.blogspot.com/2008/02/preterism-perversion-of-gospel.html
