Preston completely speculates that Christ came in 70ad. Not one passage within the entire bible says Christ came in 70ad. In order to say this happened, Don makes a huge deduction based on the assumptions that he has made. #1 that Christ coming was subject to time. #2 that Christ's coming was subject to a temporal judgment that occured in 70ad. #3 that Christ does not continue to come in judgment. #4 Christ coming is not a individual event but a corprate and external event.
The Second Coming Heb. 9:28
In Luke 21 Jesus spoke of Jerusalem's coming destruction: "then shall they see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory" vs. 27. He said "when these things come to pass then look up and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh" vs. 28. In verse 32 he said it would be in that generation. The word "redemption" used here is the identical word used in Romans 3:24; 8:23; I Corinthians 1:30; Ephesians 1:7,14, etc. to speak of the redemption of salvation. With these few facts before us let us draw a conclusion. Hebrews 9:28 says Jesus would appear a second time, not many times, unto salvation. Jesus said he was going to return at the destruction of Jerusalem and this would be the redemption (salvation) of his Body. He said it would be in that generation. Therefore Jesus' return in the destruction of Jerusalem, for the purpose of redemption, is the return of Hebrews 9:28. Since Christ's coming in 70 was the coming for redemption, and since he was to return only once for salvation per Hebrews 9:28, then Christ's return in 70 was the final coming of Christ.
https://www.eschatology.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=61
