Brian Simmons
Our conclusion is this: that the rottenness of Full Preterism may be traced to its unwholesome logical methods. Instead of seeking to fix the error of their reasoning, Full Preterists choose to bicker over the correctness of their syllogisms. Yet the syllogism consists of propositions of facts supposed to be true. If the facts themselves be proven false or uncertain, there can be no soundness in the superstructure. Thus to argue over the correctness of syllogistic models is like offering to paint and shingle a condemned building. It is a waste of effort.
http://bsimmons74.blogspot.com/
