Gene Fadeley

Fadeley says 70ad "was the beginning of the eternal, new covenant Christian age. Now I would think if something was eternal that it would have no beginning or end. So is the "new covenant Christian age" really eternal if it did not began until 70ad? I think not. This shows the natural thinking of Preterist making eternal things really just temporal events. If the Christian Age did begin in 70ad, and the old Jewish Age ended, does this not mean ALL men are now in the Christian Age since Preterist proclaim this is a post-70ad historic period?

Gene Fadeley
The 'last days' of the old covenant age were referred to many times throughout the Bible. The age that was ending was the temporary, Jewish, old covenant age. The age that was dawning was the beginning of the eternal, new covenant Christian age. They were standing on the brink of these age changing events. The completion of the 'last day' of the temporary, old covenant age had to be completed in order to usher in the eternal, new covenant age. This is a concept that is so basic and yet the traditionally conditioned mind is often so unable to comprehend it. If our age is an eternal age (Heb. 13:20), it can have no 'last days.'

http://www.bibleprophecy.com/end_times.html