Newsflash: Hyper Preterist Pseudo-Science Exposed as "Childishly Illogical"

"Jason(Bradfield) calls people morons and justifies it on the basis of his reading of the bible. People who do not believe are considered sinners. I see this as more of a reflection of his intolerance than necessarily what "god might have meant." So it's his opinion. But then, what is the difference between demeaning people based on the bible and stoning people based on the bible? It is a matter of degree, but the consequences of carrying through with such "logic" is troubling.

Since no one can prove nor disprove any of his assumptions (axioms he calls them), I suggested we look at the consequences of a worldview based on such assumptions. Jason is reluctant and throws up a bunch of technicalities and refuses to engage. The certitude and the flat refusal to see anything wrong with circular reasoning (since it is not formally fallacious, only informally fallacious) is his way to avoid debate. That is fine. I can concede points for the sake of argument, but it's his choice if he will not."

newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1/all_comments.html

Signs of a Christian???