I believe the technical term for what Kurt calls "the invention of certain modern writers" and "therefore should not be received as the teaching of the scriptures on the subject" is really just another way of saying THOSE PEOPLE ARE DECEIVED and ARE FALSE TEACHERS. While he is nicer in his approach, this would be how I would translate his words.
Kurt Simmons "The image of resurrection is used metaphorically of Israel during its captivity in Babylon and Assyria. Ezekiel saw a vision of dead bones come together and stand upon their feet, a great army. The vision was interpreted for Ezekiel as prophesying the nation’s political resurrection and restoration to its native land. (Ezek. 37) Some attempt to make an analogy and apply this vision to the church, saying there is a collective and corporate resurrection of the national to the spiritual and the political to the ecclesiastical. However tempting this analogy may seem, it is certain no New Testament writer ever speaks of the eschatological resurrection in such terms. It exists only by the invention of certain modern writers and therefore should not be received as the teaching of the scriptures on the subject."
preteristcentral.com/article-archive/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20The%20Sword%2005-08.pdf